Tag: Provider Selection Regime

Mandatory Dental Services in Oxfordshire The complaint was brought by a bidder who was the original winner of a competitive tender, but after several questions were re-evaluated (prompted by representations from the second placed bidder) the original winner was ranked second. The complainant raised concerns with the commissioner about the re-evaluation but these were rejected,…

Since its establishment in January 2024, the Independent Patient Choice and Procurement Panel (the Panel) has issued advice and recommendations in response to 18 representations about provider selection processes under the Provider Selection Regime. The Panel has found that certain issues have arisen on multiple occasions during its reviews. As a result, the Panel has…

This review has highlighted several important issues for commissioners when awarding new contracts using Direct Award Process C. • First, where contracts are low value and/or short term and commissioners wish to carry out an assessment process that is accordingly proportionate, the resulting process must still be robust, coherent and comprehensible, both to those carrying out…

Talking Therapies and Psychological Therapies for Severe Mental Health Problems for Mid and South Essex. The Panel found that MSE ICB’s provider selection process for its mental health core services contract breached the PSR regulations in several respects. The Panel’s view is that the breaches identified have had a material effect on MSE ICB’s provider…

Intermediate Minor Oral Surgery Services, Yorkshire and Humber The Panel has decided that while Barkhill’s request meets the Panel’s eligibility criteria, it will not be accepting the case on prioritisation grounds. NHS commissioning » Panel reports

The Independent Patient Choice and Procurement Panel has published its first case acceptance decision where a request for the Panel’s advice has been refused on prioritisation grounds. The decision discusses who is eligible to bring cases to the Panel, and shows how the Panel will apply its prioritisation criteria. NHS commissioning » Panel reports

Lessons in evaluation and moderation using the competitive process under the PSR regulations. The Panel identified several breaches of the applicable procurement law. The Panel’s view what that those breaches were “sufficiently serious to have had a material effect on its selection of a provider.” The Panel has therefore advised Sussex ICB to publish a…

GP Led Out of Hours Services for Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin. 1 July 2025 NHS commissioning » Panel reports

Non-Emergency Patient Transport Services in Humber and North Yorkshire The Independent Patient Choice and Procurement Panel has published its first report on a contract award using Direct Award Process C. The Panel has advised the commissioner to re-visit its assessment of whether its current provider of non-emergency patient transport services was eligible for the direct…

Primary Care Partner (GP Services) for Urgent Treatment Centre at University Hospital Lewisham NHS commissioning » Panel reports

Targeted Lung Healthcare Checks for Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin NHS commissioning » Panel reports

Intermediate Minor Oral Surgery Services for Yorkshire and the Humber. The Panel has advised that the commissioner return to their review of the unsuccessful bidders’ representations, and re-visit their response to the unsuccessful bidders’ requests for information. The commissioners should then reconsider the bidders’ representations, having given the bidders sufficient opportunity to consider any new…

Review of a proposed contract award Community Aural Microsuction Service for Norfolk and Waveney NHS commissioning » Panel reports

Adult and Paediatric Orthotics and Wheelchair Service in Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland NHS commissioning » Panel reports

Liaison and diversion and RECONNECT services for Lancashire and Cumbria

Independent Patient Choice and ProcurementPanel Report drug and alcohol services in Bath and North East Somerset NHS commissioning » Panel reports

Independent Patient Choice and Procurement Panel Review of a proposed contract award: All Age Continuing Care (AACC) Service for Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent This review considered the following matters:

Same day urgent care unit services at Aintree Hospital site The panel’s recommendation was that the procurement of services at a Same Day Urgent Care Unit in Liverpool should be abandoned and restarted, due to a number of failings in the process – involving errors in evaluation, unequal treatment and a failure to document decisions.

The first report by the Independent Patient Choice and Procurement Panel has now been published. They were asked to review a contract award decision for ADHD services. Their advice to the commissioner is that it should abandon its procurement process as a contract award would breach NHS procurement rules (the Provider Selection Regime regulations).