The High Court held that the automatic suspension should be lifted in respect of a £65m public contract for community equipment and technological equipment.
The Judge held that damages would be an adequate remedy for the Claimant and that the balance of convenience favoured the lifting of the suspension.
The Court’s judgment provides important guidance on the legal principles applicable to applications to lift automatic suspensions in procurement disputes in relation to the adequacy of damages as a remedy for a claimant.
This case highlights the court’s approach to balancing the adequacy of damages against the public interest in procurement disputes. It underscores the need for precision in assessing potential harm and the importance of maintaining competition and innovation in public service contracts.
In2 the bargain 