Automatic suspension lifted under PCR2015
The Court found that damages would be an adequate remedy for SRCL. On that basis alone, the application to lift was successful. The Court was not persuaded by arguments to the contrary advanced by SRCL, commenting that the contracts were not “prestigious in any real way; there is simply a large number of them”. It was not a “reference” contract (unlike the previous cases of Alstom and Bombardier). Other points concerning SRCL becoming less resilient and having to reduce their fleet were described as “highly speculative and uncertain”. Similarly, the Court did “not accept that the possible departure of some staff here renders damages inadequate”.
In2 the bargain 